Efficiency, Legitimacy, and Impacts of Targeting Methods: Evidence from an Experiment in Niger
No ObtainPoverty ReductionNov 2021
The procedures to decide on protection net beneficiaries are the subject matter of repeated debates. Targeting assessments normally target on efficiency by documenting the pre-program profile of picked beneficiaries. This research offers a extra comprehensive investigation of targeting general performance by means of an experiment embedded in a countrywide funds transfer program in Niger. Eligible villages ended up randomly assigned to have beneficiary homes picked by local community-based mostly targeting (CBT), proxy-implies screening (PMT), or a formulation to determine the foodstuff-insecure (FCS). The research considers targeting legitimacy and the impression of targeting selection on program performance based mostly on data gathered right after program roll-out. PMT is extra effective in identifying homes with lessen intake for every capita. Nonbeneficiaries come across formulation-based mostly procedures (PMT and FCS) extra legitimate than CBT. Manipulation and facts imperfections impact CBT, which can demonstrate why it is not the most legitimate. Plan impacts on some welfare dimensions are more substantial amid homes picked by PMT than CBT.
References
- 2012. “Targeting the Bad: Proof from a Area Experiment in Indonesia.” American Economic Assessment 102 (4): 1206–40. CrossrefGoogle Scholar .
- 2019. “Does Elite Seize Make a difference? Area Elites and Specific Welfare Programs in Indonesia.” AEA Papers and Proceedings 109: 334–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar .
- 2016a. “Community Framework and the Aggregation of Information and facts: Idea and Proof from Indonesia.” American Economic Assessment 106 (7): 1663–704. CrossrefGoogle Scholar .
- 2016b. “Self-Targeting: Proof from a Area Experiment in Indonesia.” Journal of Political Financial system 124 (two): 371–427. CrossrefGoogle Scholar .
- 2018. “Finding the Bad vs. Measuring Their Poverty: Discovering the Drivers of Targeting Usefulness in Indonesia.” World Lender Economic Assessment 33 (three): 573–97. LinkGoogle Scholar .
- 2019. “Universal Primary Income in the Producing World.” Once-a-year Assessment of Economics eleven (one): 959–83. CrossrefGoogle Scholar .
- 2000. “Seize and Governance at Area and National Amounts.” American Economic Assessment ninety (two): 135–39. CrossrefGoogle Scholar .
- 2019. “Decentralization and Effectiveness of Subsidy Targeting: Proof from Chiefs in Rural Malawi.” Journal of General public Economics 185: 1–25. Google Scholar .
- 2020. “Food items Protection Steps in Sub-Saharan Africa. A Validation of the LSMS-ISA Scale.” Journal of African Economies 29 (one): 90–120. Google Scholar .
- 2019. “Promoting Successful Inclusion and Resilience amid the Bad: Multi-nation RCT of the Sahel Adaptive Social Safety Plan.” AEA RCT Registry. Google Scholar .
- 2018. “A Bad Implies Test? Econometric Targeting in Africa.” Journal of Advancement Economics 134: 109–24. CrossrefGoogle Scholar .
- 2014. “Validity and Trustworthiness of Food items Protection Steps.” Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1331 (one): 230–48. CrossrefGoogle Scholar .
- 2004a. Targeting of Transfers in Producing Countries: Assessment of Classes and Experience. Vol. one. Washington, DC: World Lender Publications. LinkGoogle Scholar .
- 2004b. “Targeting Results Redux.” World Lender Research Observer 19 (one): 61–85. LinkGoogle Scholar .
- 2004. “On the Targeting and Redistributive Efficiencies of Option Transfer Instruments.” Assessment of Income and Wealth fifty (one): 11–27. CrossrefGoogle Scholar .
- 2002. “Local community-Based Targeting Mechanisms for Social Safety Nets: A Essential Assessment.” World Advancement 30 (three): 375–94. CrossrefGoogle Scholar .
- 2015. Safety Nets in Africa: Helpful Mechanisms to Reach the Bad and Most Susceptible. Washington, DC: World Lender and Agence Française de Développement. LinkGoogle Scholar .
- 2017. “The Targeting Usefulness of Social Transfers.” Journal of Advancement Usefulness 9 (two): 162–211. CrossrefGoogle Scholar .
- 2020. Discovering Universal Primary Income: A Information to Navigating Principles, Proof, and Techniques. Washington, DC: World Lender. LinkGoogle Scholar .
- 1995. “Proxy Implies Assessments for Targeting Social Programs.” Doing the job Paper 118, Living Standards Measurement Examine, World Lender. Washington, DC, United states of america. LinkGoogle Scholar .
- 2018. “Universal Primary Incomes compared to Specific Transfers: Anti-Poverty Programs in Producing Countries.” Journal of Economic Views 32 (4): 201–26. CrossrefGoogle Scholar .
- 2019. “Targeting Ultra-poor Homes in Honduras and Peru.” World Lender Economic Assessment 33 (one): 63–94. LinkGoogle Scholar .
- 2016. “How Narrowly Should really Anti-poverty Programs Be Specific? Simulation Proof from Bolivia and Indonesia.” Dialogue Paper Collection No. 213, Göttingen University. Göttingen, Germany. Google Scholar .
- 2016. “Retooling Poverty Targeting Working with Out-of-Sample Validation and Equipment Learning.” World Lender Economic Assessment 32 (three): 531–50. Google Scholar .
- 2013. “Local community-Based Targeting in the Social Safety Sector.” Doing the job Paper No. 514, Abroad Advancement Institute, London, United kingdom. Google Scholar
- 2012. “Further than Baseline and Follow-Up: The Scenario for Much more T in Experiments.” Journal of Advancement Economics 99 (two): 210–21. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
- 2012. “Who is Vouching for the Enter Voucher? Decentralized Targeting and Elite Seize in Tanzania.” World Advancement forty (eight): 1619–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar .
- 2020. “Behavioral Transform Promotion, Cash Transfers and Early Childhood Advancement, Experimental Proof from a Govt Plan in a Minimal-income Placing.” World Lender Plan Research Doing the job Paper No. 9368, World Lender: Washington, DC, United states of america. LinkGoogle Scholar .
- 1995. “Is Targeting Via a Operate Prerequisite Successful? Some Proof for Rural India.” In General public Paying out and the Bad: Idea and Proof. Edited by Dominique van de Walle and Kimberly Nead, 413–44. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar .
- 2009. “How Appropriate is Targeting to the Achievements of an Antipoverty Plan?” World Lender Research Observer 24 (two): 205–31. LinkGoogle Scholar .
- 2019. “How to Focus on Homes in Adaptive Social Safety Units? Proof from Humanitarian and Advancement Approaches in Niger.” Journal of Advancement Reports 55 (sup1): 75–90. CrossrefGoogle Scholar .
- 2016. “Achieving the Bad: Cash Transfer Plan Targeting in Cameroon.” World Advancement 83: 244–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar .
- 2020. “Bad Households’ Successful Investments of Cash Transfers: Quasi-Experimental Proof from Niger.” Journal of African Economies 29 (one): 63–89. Google Scholar .
- 2009. “Validating the World Food items Programme’s Food items Intake Score and Option Indicators of Family Food items Protection.” Dialogue Paper 00870, Global Food items Plan Research Institute, Washington, DC, United states of america. Google Scholar .
World Lender . 2011. “Niger Safety Web Challenge, Challenge Appraisal Document.” World Lender, Washington, DC, United states of america. Google ScholarWorld Lender . 2017. “Republic of Niger. Priorities for Ending Poverty and Boosting Shared Prosperity. Systematic Nation Diagnostic.” World Lender, Washington, DC, United states of america. LinkGoogle ScholarWorld Food items Programme . 2008. “Food Intake Investigation: Calculation and Use of the Food items Intake Score in Food items Intake and Food items Protection Investigation.” Specialized Assistance Sheet, Rome. Google Scholar- 1998. “Nonparametric Regression Methods in Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature 36 (two): 669–721. Google Scholar .