FT Executive Education Rankings 2020: methodology and key

This is the twenty second version of the Economic Instances rankings of the world’s foremost

This is the twenty second version of the Economic Instances rankings of the world’s foremost companies of customised and open up-enrolment government training programmes.

The customised ranking attributes the best eighty five business enterprise colleges — these are classes personalized to the instruction wants of the organisations that fee them. The next ranking contains the best 75 colleges for open up-enrolment programmes — classes on unique subject areas, these kinds of as management, that are directed in direction of gurus irrespective of their employer. A third, blended ranking lists the best fifty colleges for government training, calculated from the customised and open up tables.

Universities taking section ought to be internationally accredited by either Equis or AACSB and have gained revenues of at least $2m in 2019 from either their customised or open up-enrolment non-degree programmes. This year, a overall of 107 colleges took section in either or equally rankings.

The ranking of customised study course companies is compiled employing details from the business enterprise colleges and their company consumers in 2019. Every single school ought to nominate a minimal of 20 consumers. At least five of them ought to finish the FT study for a school to be qualified for the last ranking.

The FT study was accomplished by 1,one hundred thirty five business enterprise school consumers this yr — a response level of fifty six for each cent. Every single rated their programme on a 10-point scale according to a assortment of indicators. Their answers straight notify the initial 10 of the ranking’s criteria, from study course structure to adhere to-up and potential use, which account for a blended eighty for each cent of the ranking’s bodyweight.

Customer responses are weighted according to programme type. Clientele decide on just one of 3 choices to categorise their programme: strategic (delivered to best management and developed to affect a company’s course) common (delivered to management on operational areas of a firm) or useful (similar to a unique perform, these kinds of as promoting). Strategic programmes have the biggest weighting and for that reason the greatest effects on the ranking.

Responses are also weighted according to the seniority of the particular person dependable for specifying the study course, the dimensions of the consumer organisation and the number of colleges with which that consumer has commissioned customised classes in the earlier 3 a long time.

The last five criteria are calculated from facts offered by colleges on global consumers, overseas programmes, development, partner colleges and college variety.

The open up-enrolment ranking is compiled employing details from study course companies and people who accomplished their nominated management programmes in 2019. Universities post one or two common classes of at least 3 times in length and just one or two sophisticated classes of at least five times. At least 20 for each cent of these programmes’ individuals ought to finish the FT study, with a minimal of 20 accomplished surveys, for a school to be considered in the last ranking.

A overall of 5,480 individuals answered this year’s open up programme study — a response level of 37 for each cent — score components of their study course on a 10-point scale. Responses by sophisticated and common-amount individuals are blended to estimate the initial 10 ranking criteria.

These criteria, which consist of the quality of the individuals, of the teaching and the relevance of the techniques they attained, notify eighty for each cent of the ranking. School details are utilised to estimate the remaining criteria on female and global individuals, development, global spot and partner colleges.

For equally rankings, facts collected in the preceding two a long time is utilised, where obtainable, to estimate criteria knowledgeable by consumer and participant responses. If a school has participated for the earlier 3 a long time, the weighting is 40:33:27, with 2020 details counting for 40 for each cent. If two a long time of facts is obtainable, the weighting is 55:forty five, with 2020 details accounting for 55 for each cent.

The weightings accorded to the initial nine and 10 criteria in the customised and open up rankings, respectively, are established by the amount of worth consumers and individuals connect to each and every in their surveys for the 2020 ranking. Weightings for these criteria for that reason vary a little from yr to yr.

Universities that element in equally rankings are qualified for the blended over-all ranking. The best fifty colleges are calculated according to an equal weighting of the overall scores achieved in equally rankings, fairly than an common of ranking positions.

Judith Pizer of Pizer-MacMillan acted as the FT’s databases guide

Essential: Customised-enrolment programme

(weights for ranking criteria are revealed in brackets as a proportion of the over-all ranking)

The initial 10 criteria, up to and like “Future use”, are based on details from the firms that commissioned government classes.

The next five are based on details documented by business enterprise colleges. Universities are ranked for each and every of these criteria. The last group, “Total responses‡”, is for facts only and does not notify the ranking.

Figures in brackets exhibit the bodyweight each and every criterion contributes to the over-all ranking. The weighting accorded to the initial nine criteria, from preparation to price for money, accounts for eighty for each cent of the overall ranking’s bodyweight. It is established by the level of worth that consumers connect to each and every.

Preparing (eight.3): amount of interaction in between consumer and school, the extent to which clients’ concepts were integrated into the programme, and the performance of the school in integrating its most current investigate.

Programme structure (eight.4): versatility of the study course and the willingness of colleges to enhance their college with exterior experts.

Instructing strategies and materials (7.nine): extent to which teaching strategies and components were modern day and suitable, and included a acceptable blend of tutorial rigour and practical relevance.

College (eight.4): top quality of teaching and the extent to which teaching personnel labored alongside one another to present a coherent programme.

New techniques and finding out (eight.3): relevance of techniques attained to the place of work, the ease with which they were applied, and the extent to which the course encouraged new techniques of pondering.

Abide by-up (7.3): extent and performance of adhere to-up available after the study course individuals returned to their workplaces.

Aims achieved (eight.4): extent to which tutorial and business enterprise anticipations were fulfilled, and the top quality of feed-back from particular person individuals to study course commissioners.

Services (7.4): score of the finding out environment’s top quality and convenience, and of supporting resources and amenities.

Worth for money (7.7): clients’ score of the programme’s structure, teaching and components in conditions of price for money.

Upcoming use (eight.): chance that consumers would reuse the similar school for other customised programmes in the potential, and irrespective of whether they would recommission the similar programme.

Intercontinental consumers (5.): based on the proportion of consumers with headquarters outdoors the business enterprise school’s foundation country and region.

Abroad programmes (two.): global reach of the school’s customised programme teaching.

Growth (5.): based on the over-all development in revenues from customised programmes as properly as the development in revenues from repeat business enterprise.

Lover colleges (3.): quantity and top quality of programmes produced or taught in conjunction with other Equis or Association to Progress Collegiate Universities of Business enterprise (AACSB) accredited business enterprise colleges.

College variety (5.): variety of school college according to citizenship and gender.

Complete responses: number of particular person surveys accomplished by the school’s consumers. Figures in brackets reveal the number of a long time of study details counted in direction of the ranking.

Essential: Open up-enrolment programme

(weights for ranking criteria are revealed in brackets as a proportion of the over-all ranking)

The initial 10 criteria are based on details from programme individuals the next six are based on details submitted by the business enterprise colleges. Ranks are revealed for each and every of these criteria, apart from “Female participants”, which displays the proportion. Figures in brackets exhibit the bodyweight each and every criterion contributes to the over-all ranking. The weighting accorded to the initial 10 criteria, from preparation to amenities, accounts for eighty for each cent of the overall ranking’s bodyweight. It is established by the amount of worth that individuals attach to each and every.

Preparing (7.7): provision of sophisticated facts on programme content material, and the participant range procedure.

Training course structure (eight.6): versatility of the study course and appropriateness of course dimensions, composition and structure.

Instructing strategies and components (eight.3): extent to which teaching strategies and components were modern day and suitable, and included a acceptable blend of tutorial rigour and practical relevance.

College (eight.7): top quality of the teaching and the extent to which teaching personnel labored alongside one another to present a coherent programme.

High-quality of individuals (7.nine): extent to which other individuals were of the suitable managerial and tutorial typical, the global variety of individuals and the top quality of interaction amid peers.

New techniques and finding out (eight.7): relevance of techniques attained to the place of work, the ease with which they were applied, and the extent to which the study course inspired new techniques of pondering.

Abide by-up (7.3): amount of adhere to-up available after individuals returned to their workplaces, and networking options with fellow individuals.

Aims achieved (eight.4): extent to which particular and professional anticipations were fulfilled, and the chance that individuals would advise the programme.

Meals and accommodation (6.eight): score of the top quality of foods and accommodation.

Services (7.6): score of the finding out environment’s top quality and convenience, and of supporting resources and amenities.

Female individuals (two.): proportion of female study course individuals.

Intercontinental individuals (3.): based on the proportion of individuals from outdoors the business enterprise school’s foundation country and region.

Intercontinental spot (two.): extent to which programmes are run outdoors the school’s foundation country and region.

Growth (5.): based on the over-all development in revenues from open up programmes as properly as the development in revenues from repeat business enterprise.

Lover colleges (3.): quantity and top quality of programmes taught in conjunction with other Equis or AACSB accredited business enterprise colleges.

College variety (5.): variety of school college according to citizenship and gender.